Archive | December, 2011

Happy New Year and Links to My 2012 Predictions

31 Dec

Tennis Abides Community,

I’d like to wish all of you a happy new year and a great start to 2012.  I am looking forward to the Australian Open starting soon.  Big news with Andy Murray hiring Ivan Lendl.  I am not sure what to make of it, but it is an interesting hire.  Here are links to my as well as several other tennis bloggers predictions for the upcoming year.  BlackLabel Tennis was kind enough to host and edit this joint effort.  You should bookmark/follow this blog as it is really excellent.

Part 1

Part 2

All the best,
Dan Martin

 

Should Mixed Doubles be an Olympic Event?

28 Dec

I have not watched mixed doubles in years, but I did watch at the 2011 Wimbledon and saw Jurgen Melzer destroy the doubles specialist male player on the other side of the net.  What do you think about the 2012 Olympics having mixed doubles as a medal sport?

 

Who Will Finish 2012 #1 in the WTA Rankings?

24 Dec

Johan Kriek Making a Difference: Past Australian Open Champions Part 1

21 Dec

Past Australian Open Champions Part 1 – Johan Kriek

Note: Leading up to the 2012 Australian Open, I am going to take a look back and some of the Australian Open champions from previous eras and report anything interesting that I find. 

South Africa’s Johan Kriek may be one of the most anonymous tennis players in the Open Era to claim two grand slam titles.  Kriek won the Australian Open in 1981 and 1982 before the Swedes started picking off the Happy Slam.  Kriek reached #7 in the world and won matches against some of the top players from his era.  During the 2011 French Open, John McEnroe mentioned Kriek as one of the fastest players to ever play tennis along side Bjorn Borg, Michael Chang, Rafael Nadal, Novak Djokovic and Gael Monfils.

Kriek’s career was obviously quite sound.  Still, it has to be said that his Grand Slam titles came at a time when the Australian Open was considered to be a Grand Slam in name only.  Moving the Australian Open to the opening slam of the year in 1987 and to hard courts in 1988 helped revive its Grand Slam credentials.

Kriek Making a Difference

Johan Kriek is one of the founding members of the Global Water Foundation.  GWF’s goals are as follows:

The Global Water Foundation is in the service of humanity: to help make the world a better place, a healthier place, a safer place and ultimately a place of peace and prosperity. All projects and programs funded by the Global Water Foundation have the same goal: to make the world a better place for all.

GWF also has a produced a short but effective video promoting their overall mission.  Tennis as a community has had many strong responses to disease and disaster.  Arthur Ashe’s various endeavors and the 2010 Hit for Haiti are just a few examples of this large scale phenomenon.  Johan Kriek’s work is a more than worthy contribution to this trend.  Kriek is part of the humane side of professional tennis.  For that reason, we should all know a bit more about this two-time Australian Open champion and also figure out ways to impact the world off the court.

How Roger Federer avoided the Eddie Felson Trap

20 Dec

The Huslter chronicles a pool player named “Fast” Eddie Felson who seeks to play pool at a level never before reached, but whose personal failings and poor judgment in terms of associations contributed to his banishment from the game he plays like no one ever has.  This scene and abbreviated quote below demonstrate Fast Eddie’s passion for achieving excellence in his craft.

Just hadda show those creeps and those punks what the game is like when it’s great, when it’s REALLY great. You know, like anything can be great, anything can be great. I don’t care, BRICKLAYING can be great, if a guy knows. If he knows what he’s doing and why and if he can make it come off.  …. It’s a great feeling, boy, it’s a real great feeling when you’re right and you KNOW you’re right. It’s like all of a sudden I got oil in my arm. The pool cue’s part of me. You know, it’s uh – pool cue, it’s got nerves in it. It’s a piece of wood, it’s got nerves in it. Feel the roll of those balls, you don’t have to look, you just KNOW. You make shots that nobody’s ever made before. I can play that game the way… NOBODY’S ever played it before.

Roger Federer has hit plenty of shots no one has ever seen before and it would not be untrue to say that his racquet seems to have nerves in it from time to time.  David Foster Wallace offered the theory that time might actually be slower for Federer than other people and this contributes to his preternatural shot-making skills.  However, tennis history is littered with talented shot-makers who either never won big or who never consistently performed well despite the occasional paradigm shifting victory.

Destined to Disappoint?

I don’t want to take The Hustler analogy too far as I cannot fathom a situation in which Federer’s thumbs would be broken or he would be black listed from playing tennis.*  Still, Federer’s victory over Pete Sampras at Wimbledon 2001 was not followed by the immediate consistent success many expected.  Andre Agassi mugged him at the 2001 US Open (2004 and 2005 went Federer’s way in New York).  Federer threw in two first round losses at the French Open and one Wimbledon first round loss prior to his initial Grand Slam triumph.

Even after the 2003 Wimbledon title, Federer lost to David Nalbandian at the 2003 US Open and appeared to be one of the top players on tour rather than a guy who would leave Andy Roddick, Lleyton Hewitt, and Juan Carlos Ferrero so far behind that they can’t now really be viewed as peers of Federer even if they are his contemporaries.  Since 2008 Federer has won as many slams as Roddick, Hewitt and Ferrero won in their careers combined.  However, in the period between Wimbledon 2001 and Wimbledon 2003 Federer looked like a player who would forever frustrate tennis fans.

Federer: Imaginative Workman?

How did Roger avoid becoming a right-handed Henri Leconte who could hit great shots and beat great players if the stars lined up, but who would never be close to dominating the tour?  My short answer is that Federer found consistency.  I am not sure how he accomplished this, as Federer is not a grinder at heart.  However, Federer somehow wed talent akin to John McEnroe or Ilie Nadstase with professionalism and practice habits similar to those of Ivan Lendl or Jim Courier.

I do not say this as a knock against the artists on tour.  To some extent, I think if Boris Becker or Marat Safin tried to be regimented and consistent that they would somehow have lost their ability to overwhelm opponents by drawing on inspiration in big situations.  Federer’s combination of imagination and routine seems almost toxic to the idea of inspiration, and yet he has managed to combine great work habits with a desire to hit shots and play “that game the way… NOBODY’S ever played it before.”  Fast Eddie could not sustain his brilliance, but Federer did and has.  Stranger than fiction.

* I would prefer to ignore the existence of The Color of Money.

Tennis and Health: Why the United States Needs to Embrace Tennis

10 Dec

Tennis magazine’s most recent issue includes an article on tennis and nutrition.  My home country of the United States, for all of its good qualities, has several alarming trends in regards to health and fitness.  It is my belief that most of these trends can be reversed by improving the standard US diet (something like 60% of the average US calorie consumption comes from white flour, white sugar and oil – the components of a doughnut).  I will repeat that the greatest need is for dietary improvements, but increasing the activity level of the average US citizen would add to the advantages of any dietary changes.  Enter Tennis.

Tennis is a Game for Life

Growing up, I lived near a public park with three courts.  On Sundays, I would play against a friend of mine, my father and his father played and often a couple of guys who appeared to be in their 70’s or 80’s would be playing as well.  The image of two adolescents, two adults and two senior citizens all playing tennis in the same place should say it all.  Today, 25 years later my father still plays with his old sparring partner as well as new opponents.

We all have anecdotal stories about seeing multiple generations out on the court.  The other good piece of news is that one’s skill level in tennis can always improve.  Therefore, as agility, speed and reflexes decline with age better technique can help a player maintain relatively the same level of play for a long period of time.  Throw, in the world of doubles in which a player only has to cover about 60% of the court one covers in singles, and a player can play tennis as late into life as he or she wishes.

Still not Convinced?

Researchers have demonstrated that tennis players have greater bone health and a lower risk for heart disease than non-players.  People who played tennis 3 hours per week over a period of 20 years cut their risk of death from any cause in half!  Roughly 50% of the US population dies from heart disease.  70% of the US population is overweight.  18% of the US economy is dedicated to health care costs.  Tennis is no panacea for these disturbing trends.  However, tennis unlike so many other sports is a viable option for staying active during all phases of life.  It is quite difficult to put together games for sports that require ten to twenty participants to be effective even among young people (how many gym rats become last second subs for college intramural games because neither team sends enough players?).  Tennis requires two, three* or four people, and if a wall is present, tennis just requires one person for a good workout involving serves, volleys and groundstrokes.

Democratize Tennis

10 and Under Tennis is a great way to get younger people playing tennis and not succumbing to frustration.  Still, fears about tennis being an elitist and expensive sport turn many people away.  Many websites exist to help people find parks, clubs, opponents and/or instruction.  I think the USTA can do much more still to make tennis as accessible as possible.  As a sport that has a long record of helping keep people active, the governing bodies of tennis in the US need to push tennis as a sport for life.  Not only can a person play tennis for a long time, but by playing tennis a person can live longer and have a higher quality of life.  Push that and tennis will have a bright future within the US regardless of how many US players are in the top 50.

PS – Links for Finding Tennis Courts, Players and Instruction

  1. http://www.tenniswelcomecenter.com/
  2. http://tennisopolis.com/
  3. http://www.jeffsalzensteintennis.com/
  4. http://tenniszoom.net/
  5. http://setfortennis.com/
  6. http://www.juump.com/

* – What is the appropriate name for playing tennis two on one (Australian Doubles?, Canadian Doubles? Or is this one of those geographic linguistic oddities?)  From (grain of salt) Wikipedia:

Another, however informal, tennis format is called Canadian doubles. This involves three players, with one person playing a doubles team. The single player gets to utilize the alleys normally reserved only for a doubles team. Conversely, the doubles team does not use the alleys when executing a shot. The scoring is the same as a regular game. This format is not sanctioned by any official body.

“Australian doubles”, another informal and unsanctioned form of tennis, is played with similar rules to the Canadian doubles style, only in this version, players rotate court position after each game. As such, each player plays doubles and singles over the course of a match, with the singles player always serving. Scoring styles vary, but one popular method is to assign a value of 2 points to each game, with the server taking both points if he or she holds serve and the doubles team each taking one if they break serve.

Youtube Tennis for the Week of 12-4-11 through 12-10-11

5 Dec

4 Good Tennis Videos 

In honor of Davis Cup, it will be all Spanish and Argentine players featured this week.

1.  Rafael Nadal vs. Juan Martin del Potro Davis Cup 2011

2.  David Ferrer vs. Rafael Nadal Australian Open 2011

3.  Guillermo Vilas winning the 1977 French Open

4.  David Nalbandian vs. Andy Roddick 2006 Masters Cup

Who will finish 2012 #1? (Tennis Poll)

5 Dec

3rd War of Independence for Argentina? Davis Cup Final (Poll Included)

1 Dec

I opened my trusty copy of Independence in Latin America: A Comparative Approach by Richard Graham and re-learned a fact about Argentina.  Argentina fought two wars of independence against Spain.  These wars revolved around Argentina’s relationship to the deposed and later restored King Ferdinand VII of Spain. Interesting reading.  For Juan Martin del Potro, David Nalbandian and company to win against Spain on the road, they will need to depose King Rafa I.

Siglo de Oro of the Spanish Armada?

In all fairness, Spain’s rise in men’s tennis began in the 1990′s, but no country in the first two decades of this new century has placed as many players inside of the top 20 as Spain has.  Spain is also dominating Davis Cup as of late.  It is early, but Spain is the tennis nation of the new century to this point.  Argentina has also placed a lot of players into the top 20 as of late.  David Nalbandian was runner-up at the 2002 Wimbledon Championships, Gaston Gaudio won the 2004 French Open, Guillermo Coria was the rightful successor to the King of Clay title held by Juan Carlos Ferrero prior to Rafal Nadal’s rise.  Also, Juan Martin del Potro won the 2009 US Open (a year that featured a 3-0 head-to-head record with King Rafa).

Argentina – Look to France 1991

If any country can challenge Spain in Spain, it might be Argentina.  Neither nation has a great doubles team.  Winning the doubles point is a must for Argentina, but not for Spain.  Nalbandian can return serve and change the direction of the ball during a rally in a manner that frustrates even Rafa when Nalbandian is on his game.  Nalbandian will need to channel his inner Henri Leconte who was considered over the hill and out of shape by 1991.  Leconte drubbed a young Pete Sampras on an indoor court to win a point for France.  Leconte also teamed with Guy Forget to win the doubles point for France.  When Forget beat Sampras on the final day, France won the Davis Cup 3-1 versus a US team featuring Andre Agassi and Pete Sampras.  Nalbandian might pull a rabbit out of his hat, and hep Argentina win the Davis Cup.

Home Turf is the Difference

The two biggest differences between Argentina in 2011 and France in 1991 is that France had players in Forget and Leconte who could play doubles naturally and France had a rabid home crowd.  Beating a not yet dominant Pete Sampras twice on a fast indoor court might not have seemed likely, but thousands of wild fans made it plausible.  Beating Rafael Nadal and David Ferrer 3 times in singles on clay is not going to happen.  Argentina is focused and will need the doubles point while dominating Ferrer, but I think Spain wins either 3-1 or 3-2.  The Siglo de Oro continues for Spain.  Either way Vamanos!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 899 other followers