Archive | John McEnroe RSS feed for this section

Tennis Impersonations: A History

24 Dec


Alpha?

Omega?

The recent controversy about Caroline Wozniacki’s impersonation of Serena Williams got me thinking about the history of impersonating a player’s ticks or idiosyncrasies.  My mind initially thought that  Jonas Bjorkman was the progenitor of this fad.  His rain delay US Open fodder of lighthearted imitations did indeed pave the way to Djokovic’s 2007 US Open impersonation tour.   However, a more contentious and longer history came into my mind the more I thought about the topic.  It is doubtful that Rod Laver ever impersonated John Newcombe, but since the late 1980′s impersonations have popped up and generally engendered bad feelings.

1988 – Boris Becker Imitates and Gets Imitated by Pat Cash

Boris Becker won Wimbledon in 1985 and 1986.  Pat Cash was the defending champion having claimed the title in 1987.  Their 1988 quarterfinal round battle lived up to the hype, but not because of the tennis.  Becker won the match routinely 6-4, 6-3, 6-4.  Here is how Mitch Album described the memorable events on June 30, 1988:

Well. Let us take you to the second set Wednesday: Becker was leading, 4-1, and Cash came charging, hit a volley winner — and fell over the net.

Fell over the net? Yes. And Becker got so excited, he somersaulted over the net as well. Wheee. Are we having fun, or what? Now we had two guys on the wrong side. Becker was kidding. He offered his hand. Cash was serious. He offered his thoughts.

“What did he say?” someone asked Becker.

“I don’t think I should repeat it,” Becker said. “He taught me some new words in English.”

And the girls screamed. Cash wigs out after losing

But wait. Before you castigate Cash for being a poor sport, let us take you now to the post-game press conference — after Becker had humbled Cash in two hours and 17 minutes. Everyone figured the moody, broody Australian wouldn’t show, right? He had just lost his title.

But here he came, wearing a red punk-rock wig, all spikes and points. The kind that makes you look like Son of Porcupine.

1988 – Agassi Ticks off Connors and McEnroe Simultaneously

Andre Agassi’s first US Open tilt with Jimmy Connors was seen as a passing of the torch as Agassi would assume the mantle as the top US born player.  John McEnroe was watching as well.  At some point during the match, Agassi imitated McEnroe’s serving motion, an act that infuriated Johnny Mac.  Agassi’s post-match comments angered Connors into making a biting paternity joke.  Agassi did win the match 6-2, 7-6, 6-1.

1989 – Boris Becker gets Imitated by McEnroe

Boris Becker defeated John McEnroe in an epic Davis Cup encounter in Hartford, Connecticut in 1987 4-6, 15-13, 8-10, 6-2, 6-2.  Even before that match, McEnroe and Becker had exchanged tense words and stares dating back to their first match.  McEnroe’s autobiography You Cannot Be Serious describes their relationship as generally being that of friendly rivals.  At times, tensions did boil over.  McEnroe saw fit to challenge perceived gamesmanship on Becker’s part during their semifinal encounter at the 1989 Paris Indoor. McEnroe loudly coughed in response to Boris Becker’s characteristic cough.  At a changeover, Becker asked for compassion, and McEnroe retorted that Becker had been sick since 1985.  McEnroe calling Becker out for gamesmanship in this manner did not endear him to the crowd and helped inspire Becker to a 7-6, 3-6, 6-3 victory.  McEnroe even recounted that this event led to a post-match argument with his first wife.

1998 – Andre Agassi Mocks Karol Kucera

Karol Kucera had a great season in 1998.  He reached an Australian Open semifinal and a US open quarterfinal.  Along the way, Kucera dispatched of Andre Agassi in the 1998 US Open round of 16 6-3, 6-3, 6-7, 1-6, 6-3.  Kucera’s return of serve and ability to change the pace and direction of the ball during a rally mystified Agassi.  Head games were the only thing that made this match close.  Agassi, irritated by either the scoreline or Kucera’s frequently errant service toss, began to imitate a Kucera.  Agassi timidly approached the service line and mockingly attempted to toss the ball.  Beyond that, Agassi hit moonballs to his upstart opponent.  These tactics unnerved Kucera and helped the match extend to 5 sets.  Personally, this is the lowest moment of tennis imitations that I can remember.  Agassi was simply trying to throw his opponent off through mockery.

The Sampras-Agassi Hit for Haiti Debacle

The first Hit or Haiti was an unqualified success.  Major world athletes threw together an enjoyable charity event without the meddling hands of sponsors and agents.  It was a feel good event.  When Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi were added to the mix for a sequel charity doubles match, things looked great, right?  Who would not want to see all-court maestro’s Roger Federer and Pete Sampras take on two men who revolutionized backcourt tennis in Andre Agassi and Rafael Nadal?  It did not live up to the hype.

“That aint personal.” (?)

Sampras and Agassi already had some bad blood from Agassi’s recently published autobiography Open.  Agassi did not take Sampras’ imitation well and threw out a tasteless imitation implying that Pete is cheap.  Sampras went head hunting, and Agassi still pressed his claim of Sampras’ stinginess.

Lessons?

Boris Becker attempted a funny net dive when playing Pat Cash and was repaid by Cash wearing an ugly red wig?!?!  John McEnroe’s impersonation of Becker helped to inspire his opponent to victory and started an argument with his then wife.  Andre Agassi angered or incited John McEnroe and Karol Kucera with impersonations.  Agassi responded badly to Pete Sampras impersonating him.  This spiraled to a tit for tat impersonation that managed to ruin a fundraiser for a natural disaster.  Caroline Wozniacki, as well as Andy Roddick and Novak Djokovic, have made questionable imitations of Serena Williams’ body-type.

My advice is that unless an impersonation serves a purpose and is obviously approved of by the player being mimicked (a la Djokovic’s take on Guga) to not do imitations.  My main reason for saying this is not that charitable events or marriages might be threatened.  My advice for not doing imitations stems from the fact that impersonations have been done to death and are not terribly comical (Gustavo Djokovic aside).  If comedy is not funny, what is it?

The Exception that Proves the Rule? (No Impersonations Unless They are This Funny?)

Do You Prefer McEnroe or Courier’s Commentary? POLL

3 Sep

Youtube Tennis for the Week of 4-10 through 4-14-2012

10 Apr

1. Edberg vs. McEnroe at Wimbledon 1989

2.  Muster vs. Sampras 1995

3.  John Isner vs. Gilles Simon 2012

The Psychology of Defending Points

19 Mar

Historical Difficulty with Repeating

Rafael Nadal won nearly everything of importance from the onset of the clay court season of 2010 through the conclusion of the US Open 2010.  Nadal’s 2011 did not feature the same level of success.  The same could be said for Nadal’s 2008 French Open, Wimbledon, and Olympic Gold trifecta was followed by an Australian Open title in 2009 and not much else from Nadal.  Jim Courier first launched himself into the top tier of tennis by winning both Indian Wells and Miami in 1991.  After winning the 1992 Australian Open, Courier claimed the number one ranking right as he had many points to defend.  Courier stumbled at both hard court events and lost the number one ranking.  Courier of course rebounded winning two indoor events in a now defunct Asian indoor swing that followed Miami, winning the Italian Open and winning the French Open to reclaim the number one ranking.  Still, Courier admitted that the computer had impacted his play in Miami and California.  For the remainder of 1992 and 1993, Courier would simply say a player cannot beat the computer and therefore should simply ignore it.

Different Approaches

John Feinstein’s 1991 book Hard Courts explored how at that time U.S. born players such as Jimmy Connors and John McEnroe viewed the number one ranking as something to claim and defend.  He noted that European players such as Boris Becker and Mats Wilander looked at the number one ranking like an honor to attain, but did not view it as something akin to a boxing heavy weight title that requires defense.  Ivan Lendl and Stefan Edberg were already exceptions to Feinstein’s observation.  The presence of these exceptions throws some doubt onto the notion in the first place.  Undoubtedly, Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic all take pride in holding the number one ranking as well.

Still, if one considers that Boris Becker and Stefan Edberg had pretty similar levels of success with the lone exception of their time at number one.  Becker never finished a single season ranked number one and held the ranking for a total of twelve weeks.  Edberg finished 1990 and 1991 ranked number one and spent seventy-two total weeks atop of the rankings.  A sixty week difference implies to me that Becker did not care a great deal about holding the number one ranking.  This counter-intuitive approach would save a player from any stresses associated with fears of losing the top spot.  If a player does not care where he is ranked, he may be free to play better tennis in any given situation.

The approach of holding the number one ranking and defending it resonates more with my gut than the idea of keeping the ranking at arms length.  Jimmy Connors held the number one ranking for many weeks when most tennis pundits considered Bjorn Borg to be the top player in the world.  John McEnroe and Ivan Lendl locked horns over the number one ranking and a changing of the guard occurred in 1985 from which McEnroe never really recovered.

Today’s players seem to be somewhere in-between Feinstein’s two approaches to the number one ranking.  Roger Federer clearly wanted to hold the top spot in 2008, but when he lost the number one ranking it did not stop him from winning the 2008 US Open or having a successful 2009.  Rafael Nadal philosophically says that he seeks to be the best he can be and if that is behind someone else being number two is not bad.  He however says he will always seek to improve making a return to number one plausible.  Even Pete Sampras gracefully gave up defending number one in 1999 only to win Wimbledon in 1999 and 2000 while also winning the US Open in 2002.

Hunter versus Hunted

To get to my point, I think Novak Djokovic will need to come to some sort of solution that works for him.  From January 2011 through September 2011, Djokovic won nearly every big tournament.  He piled up enough computer points that the need to defend points from March through June 2012 should be minimal.  To paraphrase a comment on this week’s power rankings, Novak does not need to win everything in 2012, but he does need to win more than anyone else does.  His Australian Open title is a great start to carving out a 2012 that will keep him atop of the rankings.  Djokovic is a smart guy and seems to be taking all of this in stride.

Roger Federer, despite being thirty and having finished each season starting in 2001 among the top eight players in the world, seems to be relishing a chance to build his rankings up toward a tangible goal rather than defending territory earned in the previous seasons.  To this point, Federer’s three consecutive titles place him in a clear second slot for 2012.  At both Indian Wells and Dubai, Federer has gained on Djokovic relative to last year’s results.  2012 is shaping up to be a season in which the old man may get one last run at the top while Novak methodically puts together a year that leaves him number one when the season finishes.  Given the wrinkles added by the Olympic games, some positive signs in Andy Murray’s game, and Rafa’s iron will, 2012 may be a most interesting year in terms of tennis psychology.

Johan Kriek Making a Difference: Past Australian Open Champions Part 1

21 Dec

Past Australian Open Champions Part 1 – Johan Kriek

Note: Leading up to the 2012 Australian Open, I am going to take a look back and some of the Australian Open champions from previous eras and report anything interesting that I find. 

South Africa’s Johan Kriek may be one of the most anonymous tennis players in the Open Era to claim two grand slam titles.  Kriek won the Australian Open in 1981 and 1982 before the Swedes started picking off the Happy Slam.  Kriek reached #7 in the world and won matches against some of the top players from his era.  During the 2011 French Open, John McEnroe mentioned Kriek as one of the fastest players to ever play tennis along side Bjorn Borg, Michael Chang, Rafael Nadal, Novak Djokovic and Gael Monfils.

Kriek’s career was obviously quite sound.  Still, it has to be said that his Grand Slam titles came at a time when the Australian Open was considered to be a Grand Slam in name only.  Moving the Australian Open to the opening slam of the year in 1987 and to hard courts in 1988 helped revive its Grand Slam credentials.

Kriek Making a Difference

Johan Kriek is one of the founding members of the Global Water Foundation.  GWF’s goals are as follows:

The Global Water Foundation is in the service of humanity: to help make the world a better place, a healthier place, a safer place and ultimately a place of peace and prosperity. All projects and programs funded by the Global Water Foundation have the same goal: to make the world a better place for all.

GWF also has a produced a short but effective video promoting their overall mission.  Tennis as a community has had many strong responses to disease and disaster.  Arthur Ashe’s various endeavors and the 2010 Hit for Haiti are just a few examples of this large scale phenomenon.  Johan Kriek’s work is a more than worthy contribution to this trend.  Kriek is part of the humane side of professional tennis.  For that reason, we should all know a bit more about this two-time Australian Open champion and also figure out ways to impact the world off the court.

Thomas Muster Retires Again

28 Oct

Thomas “Coach” Muster?

A lot of good can be said about how hard Thomas Muster worked on and off of the tennis court.  Muster is best know for his perseverance to overcome a freak knee injury and his amazing clay court play in 1995.  Muster played a sort of visceral tennis that often looked like he was trying to mug his opponent in a street fight.  I saw Muster mix it up with Andre Agassi, Boris Becker, and Brad Gilbert.

After his first retirement, I thought Muster might make a good coach or consultant for Roger Federer in 2007 as Federer tried to figure out how to play against another left-handed monster in Rafael Nadal.  I figured that the Austrian and the Swiss each spoke German and that Muster could help Federer in the way that Tony Roche helped Ivan Lendl figure out the left-handed John McEnroe.

I doubt Federer at 30 is going to make any huge coaching moves.  Still, I think Muster could be an excellent coach if he so desired.  Muster’s working with Thomaz Bellucci or even Grigor Dimitrov might help each player figure out how to play a more muscular and disciplined brand of tennis.  Who would be better at helping younger players understand the physical sacrifices needed to make it to the elite tier of the game?  All I am saying to Muster is “Happy Re-Retirement” but don’t stay gone for too long.

Youtube Tennis for 10-24-2011 through 10-30-2011

24 Oct

Three Good Tennis Videos

1.  Pan-Slavic Tennis: An All-Serbian Final of the Kremlin Cup in Moscow

Jannko Tipsarevic continues his climb in the rankings with a win over Viktor Troicki 6-4, 6-2.

 2.  Gael Monfils won in Stockholm: Here is a US Open Highlight

Monfils, much like Murray, has seen his career hampered by playing defensively too often.  Admittedly, his defensive play is amazing.

3. John McEnroe d. Jimmy Connors 1980 US Open Semifinal 6-4, 5-7, 0-6, 6-3, 7-6

 I don’t know what is best, a close 5th set in a slam semifinal, Connors’ beard or mentioning WKRP in Cincinnati as a favorite show to be broadcast once the match ends.

Poll – Best Season in Men’s Tennis History

24 Sep

Best US Open Final

16 Sep

Jimmy Connors Part 2

10 Sep

Preface

Novak Djokovic just completing a 2 sets to love comeback in the US Open semifinal makes writing this a bit surreal.  I think comebacks from 2 sets down are one of the most unique events in all of the sporting world. Jimmy Connors turned the momentum of one such comeback into an indelible memory for all tennis fans.

1991 and Early Magic

Prior to the US Open, Jimmy Connors had already put forth an interesting set of results in 1991.  He won a 5 set match at the French Open versus Ronald Agenor and then lost a 5 set tilt with Michael Chang.   At Wimbledon, Jimmy beat Aaron Krickstein before losing to Derrick Rostagno.  In both Paris and London, Connors reached the round of 32. Not bad for a 38 year old man coming back from one year off due to wrist surgery.

My Memories of Jimmy’s US Open Run

Jimmy Connors drew the 1991 Australian Open semifinalist Patrick McEnroe in the first round.  This was not an ideal draw, and the seeds in Jimmy’s quarter of the draw were Karel Novacek, Andre Agassi, Petr Korda and Boris Becker.  Connors was slated to possibly face the 10th seeded Novacek in the 3rd round.

Connors d. Patrick McEnroe 4-6, 6-7, 6-4, 6-2, 6-4 

The first two sets saw similar players scrap on the court.  Connors came up short in two close sets and looked to be in serious trouble.  My parents insisted I needed sleep before school in the morning when the second set ended.  I told my parents, “I’m going to be upset if I wake up and Jimmy has come back to win.”  My parents won the argument.  Sure enough sometime in my sleeping hours, my older brother woke me up to tell me Connors had won.    This has to be the most famous come from behind match in US Open history.  Also, Agassi and Korda lost in the first round.

 Connors d. Michiel Schapers 6-2, 6-3, 6-2

I vowed to watch this night match from start to finish no matter what time school came the next day.  Fortunately, this was a one sided affair.  The crowd was strongly behind Connors before the match began, and Schapers did not have the game to trouble Jimmy.   This match felt like a victory lap.  An easy night match victory had me excited to see where this run was headed.  The electricity from the crowd, even on television during a one-sided match, was captivating.

Connors d. Karel Novacek 6-1, 6-4, 6-3

Jimmy facing the #10 seed and a daytime match had me worried.  How would Jimmy handle the heat and a top 10 seed?  Instead, he made Novacek look bad. Jimmy bested the heat and Novacek with ease.  Plus, #1 seed Boris Becker was beaten in the 3rd round.  I started thinking Connors could reach the semifinal round because Connors had handled Krickstein so easily at Wimbledon just 2 months earlier.

Connors d. Aaron Krickstein 3-6, 7-6, 1-6, 6-2, 7-6

Krickstein put forth a great effort at the 1991 US Open himself.   He beat Andre Agassi in straight sets to open the tournament.  He had also reached the US Open quarterfinal round in 1988 and 1990 and reached the semifinal round in 1989.   He had a habit of digging deep and winning long matches in New York.  Krickstein was one of my favorite players to watch at the US Open because he always seemed to pull off a win or push a top guy to the limit.  Still, I was firmly in the Connors camp.

Any thoughts of an easy Labor Day win evaporated in the first set. Krickstein looked cool, he was hitting his forehand well, and he was riding momentum from his first round drubbing of Andre Agassi.  I recall the second set being a back and forth affair.  The tiebreaker in the second set was full of tension.  Both guys had chances, but a controversial exchange with the umpire fueled Connors as he won the set and leveled the match. In 1990, John McEnroe had been defaulted from the Australian Open for an outburst over officiating.   During the exchange, I was concerned that Connors might get defaulted.    Connors avoided certain magic words, but I was a bit surprised that no warnings were issued.   Krickstein and Connors made short work of the 3rd and 4th sets with each taking one set in a one-sided manner.

Connors seemed to rest in the 3rd, but opened the 5th set by coming to the net a little too predictably and fell behind.  Jimmy came back from 2-5 down to force a 5th set tiebreaker.  I remember my adrenaline flowing from just watching the 5th set and was amazed at how well Connors kept his nerve to finish the match.  The love affair with the crowd was at what seemed to be a maximum level.  It did not hurt that it was both Labor Day and Jimmy’s 39th birthday.

Connors d. Paul Haarhuis 4-6, 7-6, 6-4, 6-2

Connors was facing a player who had posted big wins at the US Open over John McEnroe in 1989 and #1 seed Boris Becker earlier at the 1991 event. I remember Haarhuis playing John McEnroe in 1989 with shoes that were falling apart due to having no sponsorship deal.   2 years later he entered his match with Connors as the favorite to reach a Grand Slam semifinal. Haarhuis had a big forehand, a strong serve and more firepower than Krickstein or Patrick McEnroe.  For most of 2 sets, it looked like Connors was just up against too much firepower.

The entire match shifted on a single point.   Connors threw up 4 lobs and then hit a screaming backhand winner on the full run to level the second set.  I as a tennis player and fan feel privileged to have watched that point as it happened.  The love affair between Jimmy Connors and the crowd indeed topped even the conclusion of the Krickstein match.  Connors took control of the match and reached a Grand Slam semifinal at the age of 39.

Jim Courier d. Connors 6-3, 6-3, 6-2

The 4th seed and reigning French Open champion was the wrong type of player for a 39 year old to beat.  Courier had more power than Haarhuis. He was more consistent than Krickstein.  He was as fit as any man on tour. He also liked to grind and fight.  I remember an early point in the match in which Connors seemingly had the point won with a lob and Courier ran the lob down and took the point.  Connors had very few options in how to attack a player 18 years younger than him playing as well as Courier was. Courier would reach higher places in 1992 and 1993, but Courier was playing incredibly well in 1991 and had not dropped a set in reaching his first US Open final (Stefan Edberg changed that factoid by demolishing Courier in the final).

I felt sad at the result, but also felt that Jimbo had won every match in which he had a realistic chance to win.  As much as Edberg owned Courier in the final, I think the contrast in match-ups between Connors and Edberg might have given Jimmy a chance to make his return of serve and passing shots a factor had he drawn the Swede in the semifinal round.  Courier was too consistent and did not give Jimmy any sort of a target.

Post Script

This of course was not the end of Jimmy capturing some imagination in New York.  Jimmy won a straight sets first round match in 1992 on his 40th birthday.  He also stormed through the first set and took a break lead in the 2nd set before succumbing to Ivan Lendl in the 1992 2nd round.  I am glad I saw those two night matches in 1992.  Jimmy Connors helped get me into playing and following tennis and few athletes in any sport have been able to make the crowd react the way Jimmy did.

It has been 20 years since his magical run and a lot of memorable things have happened in New York.  Pete Sampras overcame illness in 1996 and won as a going away gift in 2002.  Roger Federer won 5 consecutive titles. Patrick Rafter, Lleyton Hewitt and Rafa Nadal were warriors in their title runs.  Andy Roddick won from two sets down in the 2003 semifinal before taking the title.  Andre Agassi had a lot of moments.  Marat Safin and Stefan Edberg put on jaw dropping displays in one-sided final victories. Still, nothing has recaptured the imagination of the live crowd the way Jimmy Connors did in 1991.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 895 other followers