Archive | Tennis RSS feed for this section

PEDs: Lance Armstrong & MLB’s Lessons for Tennis

13 Jan

Performance Enhancing Drugs have made minimal news in the world of tennis. Major League Baseball begins considering MLB Hall of Fame credentials from players from the gaudy steroid era (juiced ball explanations ran afoul).  Cycling has Lance Armstrong possibly coming clean due to any number of first person accounts rendering plausible deniability moot.  Cycling and baseball do offer a cautionary tale for tennis.

What about tennis?  My gut says that tennis is still fairly clean as a sport.  Still, some PEDs help with the production of fast twitch muscle fibers.  These would help with racquet head speed in the same manner that they helped with baseball swing speeds.  Other PEDs help with stamina and recovery time.  Given that the tennis season stretches over 10 months with events on 6 continents, it is quite possible that some players may want a boost in recovering from matches and travel just as participants in cycling have done.

With no evidence, I am not going to level any accusations.  I have no one specifically to suspect.  I also think that slander is serious business.  I do think that if tennis does not maintain vigilance and increase sophistication to match new methods of dopping it may find that the bells tolling for cycling and baseball begin to toll for the ATP, WTA and ITF.

Should I Add Audio Commentary to my Site?

15 Jun

I’d be adding some short audio files commenting on events in tennis if I go this direction.

Link for viewing the NCAA Tennis Championships

28 May

Watch NCAA Tennis by following this link:

http://www.ncaa.com/liveschedule

Good luck to Eric Quigley of the University of Kentucky and Pee Wee Valley, KY – Just outside of Louisville on I-71

I will be posting some French Open thoughts this evening.

Thoughts on Pat Summitt and Billie Jean King

19 Apr

Pat Summitt Retires

I grew up in Kentucky where college basketball is the life blood of the state.  As an aside, the University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, Murray State University and Western Kentucky University combined to win 2 conference titles and 3 conference tournament titles, to make two Final Four appearances, to win one NCAA title, and to post a 12-3 win loss record in the recent NCAA men’s basketball tournament.  Pat Summitt’s Tennessee teams were regular fixtures in the late stages of NCAA women’s basketball tournaments from my childhood in the 1980′s through 2012.  Summitt no longer being an active coach is a sad day for the sports.

Pat Summitt and Billie Jean King

During those same 1980′s when I was aware of Summitt’s work at Tennessee, women’s tennis was (and still is) firmly planted as the most prestigious sport open to women.  The status of women in tennis is completely indebted to the work of Billie Jean King.  In the 1980′s, I thought King may have been the subject of a Michael Jackson song and was not aware of how important her life as an athlete and Summitt’s work as a coach were.  Looking back, I think it is safe to say that women’s sports in the United States and around the world ranging from volleyball to soccer would not be where they are today without the work of King and Summitt.  As a son, brother and father, I am glad to see so many doors opened.  It is important at a time like this to appreciate the two women who opened the most doors.

Review of Bring Your Racquet: Tennis Basics for Kids

24 Mar

Certified tennis professional Steven White’s book Bring Your Racquet: Tennis Basics for Kids is a great contribution to the larger endeavor of making tennis more accessible for young people.  This is a cause that is close to my heart because I feel many kids show interest in tennis and hack around a bit without receiving proper instruction.  These young people tend to give up on the sport.  White’s book along with efforts such as 10 and Under Tennis can hopefully be part of a large scale attempt to encourage life-long participation in tennis.

The Format of this Book if Beautiful and Simple

White does a great job of explaining each concept in no more than two pages.  This keeps a beginning player from becoming bogged down in details or suffering from paralysis by analysis.  White’s book has the unique feature of including Manga illustrations that will draw the attention of younger readers.  The illustrations are excellent and informative.  Illustrations range from demonstrating various grips tennis players use to exhibiting the proper form for a reliable serve to promoting self-confidence in new players.  These excellent illustrations alone make this affordable book one to add to your tennis library.

Beyond the illustrations, this book is formatted in such a way as to walk a player through all of the necessary skills required to get off to a promising start as a tennis player.  The language of the text is clear and informative.  White begins by looking at grips and footwork and progresses through strokes.  Finally, he concludes by looking at the mental side of tennis.  This progression will be most helpful to a new player.  Intermediate and experienced players can easily refer to sections that pertain to an area where their game may be struggling.  I love that White emphasizes good practice habits and self-confidence in his book.  As a parent, it is easy to see how these skills learned on a tennis court will also translate into other areas of life.  White’s organization and attentive use of language will help his readers acquire a desire to improve as a tennis player as well as the belief that this improvement is likely with good habits and practice (practice, practice).

The Content of this Book is Clear and Sound

White is not only a certified teaching professional but also was a player on the satellite tour.   He clearly knows his subject matter.  I have never played tennis at White’s level, but my day job is that of an educator and I can tell that White’s expertise is filtered through the heart of a teacher.  Each section expresses pragmatic tennis wisdom as well as a passion for tennis itself.  I found White’s section on mental fortitude and self-confidence to be personally beneficial.  This book can be of help to not just young tennis players but to all players who need distilled tennis wisdom.

Two aspects of the content of this book stood out to me.  First, White does an excellent job of explaining the pluses and minuses of hitting a two-handed backhand.  His insistence that players with two-handed backhands also learn a one-handed slice backhand for situations calling for greater reach and improvisation is just darn good advice.  White breaking down how a player can develop a reliable serve as well as how to be a fluent returner is also exceptionally important.  Serving, returning, having versatility and self-confidence are all utterly important in developing as a tennis player.

Bring Your Racquet: Tennis Basics for Kids expresses tennis fundamentals with accuracy and precision.  The illustrations are helpful and engaging.  Finally, Steven White’s love of tennis and patience as a teacher both shine through to readers.  For all of these reasons, I highly recommend Bring Your Racquet: Tennis Basics for Kids.  I just wish I had read it when I was first learning tennis.

An Example of the Great Art

Site Update

13 Feb

A quick note to my readers.  I have had a lingering computer issue that has cut into my posting the past 2 weeks.  It is still not yet resolved, but rest assured some good posts are coming.  I am not a huge Davis Cup person so this lull in posts is not coming at the worst possible time, but it has not been easy to step away from writing after such a great Australian Open.

A Bad Weekend for Roger Federer

13 Feb

Roger Federer Goes 0-2 in the 2012 Davis Cup

Roger Federer losing to John Isner in singles as well as losing the deciding doubles point for Switzerland will go into the files as one of his worst weekends.  Going forward it will be interesting to see if Federer is suffering from tour fatigue or if this was an aberration.  With Andy Murray looking to make a charge and with Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal clearly out in front of Roger at the moment, motivation and concentration will be key to his 2012.  I think Federer will be fine and he has been beyond consistent in his career.  Even Roger is entitled to a bad weekend now and again.

Milos Raonic Leads a New Wave

12 Jan

Historical Waves

Tennis players tend to arrive in waves.  Pete Sampras was so dominant that his generation, including Andre Agassi, Jim Courier, Sergi Bruguera, Goran Ivanisevic, Thomas Muster, Michael Chang, and Richard Krajicek, more or less eclipsed the next group of promising players.  To be sure, Gustavo Kuerten, Patrick Rafter and Yevgeny Kafelnikov made marks in the historical records, but most others failed to break through on the biggest stages of tennis.  That led to the New Balls generation taking the reigns starting with Marat Safin and Lleyton Hewitt’s successes in 2000 and 2001.  Guga could be placed with this group as he was part of the promotional campaign, but he was older than most of the featured players.  Juan Carlos Ferrero and Andy Roddick broke through in 2003, but Roger Federer’s 16 major titles set a benchmark for him as the greatest and last champion of the New Balls Era.

The Nadal-Djokovic Era

Federer has had more Grand Slam successes than Sampras did, but he did not crowd out most of the players 4-6 years his junior.  This is mainly due to the preternatural motor that Rafael Nadal possesses.  Nadal led a post New Balls wave of players into the elite levels of tennis starting in 2005.  Novak Djokovic broke through in 2007 and early 2008.  Andy Murray, Juan Martin del Potro and Jo-Wilfried Tsonga have all reached at least one major final.  This generation players just now seem to be sinking their collective teeth into the tour.  Federer is the lone hold out from the previous era who is still a plausible threat.

Raonic’s Brood

Still, that does not keep us from looking ahead.  Last week, tennis fans saw Milos Raonic win a title over a top 10 opponent in a tense final.  Milos impressed Pete Sampras during the off season.  Alexandr Dolgopolov was runner-up at another Australian Open tune-up. Bernard Tomic earned Andy Murray’s praise.  Ryan Harrison has some buzz.  It remains to be seen if this next wave will produce a champion of Sampras, Federer or Nadal’s caliber.  This next wave may end up with players more along the lines of Thomas Enqvist.  Perhaps, a tandem of champions similar to Boris Becker and Stefan Edberg will emerge.  I think the window for piling up majors is broader today than it once was because surfaces are much more uniform.  Would Ivan Lendl have more than 8 majors if the Australian Open had been on a slow hard court for his entire career and Wimbledon had been slowed down?  I think so.

However, I also think tennis has become so physically grueling, in large part due to the slower courts, that the youthful breakthrough wins one saw from Mats Wilander, Boris Becker, and Michael Chang are far less likely.  Of the current players in the new wave, only Raonic seems capable at present of making consistent second week runs in majors because he generates so many free points.  I could see Dolgopolov or Tomic pulling an upset of a top gun, but stamina becomes an issue if beating Federer in 5 sets then means playing Nadal or Djokovic.  All of these younger players are developing that physical toughness needed, but by the time it develops and Djokovic, Nadal and Murray are declining it may only leave a 2-4 year window for winning majors.  I don’t mourn for this new generation, but I do think the mountain facing them is steeper than what many previous generations faced.

Post Script – See This Poll

Should Mixed Doubles be an Olympic Event?

28 Dec

I have not watched mixed doubles in years, but I did watch at the 2011 Wimbledon and saw Jurgen Melzer destroy the doubles specialist male player on the other side of the net.  What do you think about the 2012 Olympics having mixed doubles as a medal sport?

 

Tennis and Health: Why the United States Needs to Embrace Tennis

10 Dec

Tennis magazine’s most recent issue includes an article on tennis and nutrition.  My home country of the United States, for all of its good qualities, has several alarming trends in regards to health and fitness.  It is my belief that most of these trends can be reversed by improving the standard US diet (something like 60% of the average US calorie consumption comes from white flour, white sugar and oil – the components of a doughnut).  I will repeat that the greatest need is for dietary improvements, but increasing the activity level of the average US citizen would add to the advantages of any dietary changes.  Enter Tennis.

Tennis is a Game for Life

Growing up, I lived near a public park with three courts.  On Sundays, I would play against a friend of mine, my father and his father played and often a couple of guys who appeared to be in their 70’s or 80’s would be playing as well.  The image of two adolescents, two adults and two senior citizens all playing tennis in the same place should say it all.  Today, 25 years later my father still plays with his old sparring partner as well as new opponents.

We all have anecdotal stories about seeing multiple generations out on the court.  The other good piece of news is that one’s skill level in tennis can always improve.  Therefore, as agility, speed and reflexes decline with age better technique can help a player maintain relatively the same level of play for a long period of time.  Throw, in the world of doubles in which a player only has to cover about 60% of the court one covers in singles, and a player can play tennis as late into life as he or she wishes.

Still not Convinced?

Researchers have demonstrated that tennis players have greater bone health and a lower risk for heart disease than non-players.  People who played tennis 3 hours per week over a period of 20 years cut their risk of death from any cause in half!  Roughly 50% of the US population dies from heart disease.  70% of the US population is overweight.  18% of the US economy is dedicated to health care costs.  Tennis is no panacea for these disturbing trends.  However, tennis unlike so many other sports is a viable option for staying active during all phases of life.  It is quite difficult to put together games for sports that require ten to twenty participants to be effective even among young people (how many gym rats become last second subs for college intramural games because neither team sends enough players?).  Tennis requires two, three* or four people, and if a wall is present, tennis just requires one person for a good workout involving serves, volleys and groundstrokes.

Democratize Tennis

10 and Under Tennis is a great way to get younger people playing tennis and not succumbing to frustration.  Still, fears about tennis being an elitist and expensive sport turn many people away.  Many websites exist to help people find parks, clubs, opponents and/or instruction.  I think the USTA can do much more still to make tennis as accessible as possible.  As a sport that has a long record of helping keep people active, the governing bodies of tennis in the US need to push tennis as a sport for life.  Not only can a person play tennis for a long time, but by playing tennis a person can live longer and have a higher quality of life.  Push that and tennis will have a bright future within the US regardless of how many US players are in the top 50.

PS – Links for Finding Tennis Courts, Players and Instruction

  1. http://www.tenniswelcomecenter.com/
  2. http://tennisopolis.com/
  3. http://www.jeffsalzensteintennis.com/
  4. http://tenniszoom.net/
  5. http://setfortennis.com/
  6. http://www.juump.com/

* – What is the appropriate name for playing tennis two on one (Australian Doubles?, Canadian Doubles? Or is this one of those geographic linguistic oddities?)  From (grain of salt) Wikipedia:

Another, however informal, tennis format is called Canadian doubles. This involves three players, with one person playing a doubles team. The single player gets to utilize the alleys normally reserved only for a doubles team. Conversely, the doubles team does not use the alleys when executing a shot. The scoring is the same as a regular game. This format is not sanctioned by any official body.

“Australian doubles”, another informal and unsanctioned form of tennis, is played with similar rules to the Canadian doubles style, only in this version, players rotate court position after each game. As such, each player plays doubles and singles over the course of a match, with the singles player always serving. Scoring styles vary, but one popular method is to assign a value of 2 points to each game, with the server taking both points if he or she holds serve and the doubles team each taking one if they break serve.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 899 other followers