Krickstein’s Own 30 for 30

Prologue: Jimmy Connors as Scarface

The recent This is What They Want ESPN 30 for 30 documentary focusing on Jimmy Connors certainly portrayed Connors as a guy who is comfortable with who he is.  It reminded me of the “I’m the bad guy” speech from Scarface (a wildly overrated film in my view):

So… what that make you? Good? You’re not good. You just know how to hide, how to lie. Me, I don’t have that problem. Me, I always tell the truth. Even when I lie.

Connors makes no apologies for who he is or how he played.  He even asks why anyone would expect him to apologize for trying to win. Connors’ unapologetic nature is an interesting contrast to Andre Agassi’s teetering between bad and good behavior as explored in his autobiography Open.

Krickstein’s Own Remarkable US Open Run

Unfortunately, as successful as Aaron Krickstein was in his career, tennis players whose careers topped out at #6 in the world are rarely the focus of a documentary.  Still, Aaron Krickstein reached the US Open quarterfinal round in 1988 by beating Stefan Edberg 7-5 in the 5th set of a classic night match in the round of 16.  In 1989, Krickstein reached the US Open semifinal round losing to the eventual champion Boris Becker.  In 1990, Krickstein again faced Becker at the US Open, but this time in the quarterfinal round. This match went 4 sets.  Krickstein was a great US Open performer.  That fact was reaffirmed when he drubbed Andre Agassi in the 1st round of the 1991 US Open.  Had Krickstein beaten Connors, he would have had a fair chance of beating Paul Haarhauis and reaching his second Grand Slam semifinal in 3 years.

This is What They Want explored how the 1991 losses to Jimmy Connors stuck with Patrick McEnroe and especially with Aaron Krickstein.  Not only did Krickstein lose a match, but Connors has never spoken to him since their famous encounter.  Krickstein was also dropped by his coach, the late Tim Gullikson, shortly after that loss.  Krickstein did follow-up his loss to Connors with a runner-up finish in Brisbane in late September 1991. Krickstein would add two more runner-up finishes to his career tally after 1991.  Notably, he was runner-up at Monte Carlo in 1992.  Krickstein won 2 titles after his Labor Day loss to Connors.  Clearly, Krickstein did not simply retire after his US Open loss to Connors.  He even logged upset wins over Boris Becker, Michael Stich and Sergi Bruguera in his post 1991 US Open career.

Proposed Epilogue to This is What They Want

Aaron Krickstein had a 7-10 head-to-head record against Stefan Edberg. The two would stage another 5 set Grand Slam match.  1995 offered Krickstein a chance to do what Connors did in 1991. Krickstein was not 39 years old, but he also had not spent 160 consecutive weeks ranked #1 or 268 total weeks ranked #1. Connors reached the 1989 US Open quarterfinal losing in a strange 5 sets to Andre Agassi at the age of 37. What Connors did in 1991 was more remarkable for his recovery from a wrist injury and surgery than for his age as he had similar US Open runs in 1988 and 1989 after a tremendous 1987 campaign.  Krickstein had an injury plagued career.  Still, Krickstein did have a moment to make an improbable run late in his career.

Krickstein entered the 1995 Australian Open at a time when his career was in twilight. He won a 4 set first round match setting up a showdown with the 11th seed Wayne Ferreira who was a strong hard court player with past success at the Australian Open. Kricksetin pulled an upset defeating the South African in 4 tight sets.  Krickstein then faced 1992 French Open runner-up Petr Korda in the 3rd round.  Krickstein beat the man who would win the Australian Open in 1998 in straight sets.

Krickstein earned a match with Stefan Edberg in the round of 16.  Edberg had been 28-5 at the Australian Open over the previous 5 years.   Edberg was the 6th seed and won the first two sets 7-6, 7-5.  What followed to my mind should exorcize any hangover from 1991.  Krickstein won the next 3 sets 6-4, 7-6, 6-4.  Coming back from two sets down against a great champion to reach his first Grand Slam quarterfinal since the 1990 US Open was Krickstein’s reward.

Aaron went on to win his quarterfinal match in 4 sets to reach his second career Grand Slam semifinal.  Krickstein lost in a one-sided fashion to a red hot Andre Agassi when injury and fatigue took its full toll.  Krickstein joined Agassi, Michael Chang and Pete Sampras in the semifinal round setting up an all-US final four.  This run was every bit as unexpected as Connors’ run in 1991.  Krickstein was not a household name.  He had not won 8 Grand Slams.  For these reasons, Krickstein’s 1995 semifinal ride has never gotten much attention.  Still, on the DVD/BluRay release of This is What They Want, I’d like to see a five to ten minute bonus feature asking Krickstein to re-live his six 1995 matches in Melbourne.  It would be great for tennis fanatics.  I am also guessing that Krickstein would enjoy giving those insights.

Post Script: Comparing the Two Improbable Semifinal Runs

  • First Round Connors d. Patrick McEnroe 4-6, 6-7, 6-4, 6-2, 6-4
  • Second Round Connors d. Schapers 6-2, 6-3, 6-2
  • Third Round Connors d. Novacek 6-1, 6-4, 6-3
  • Fourth Round Connors d. Krickstein 3-6, 7-6, 1-6, 6-3, 7-6
  • Quarterfinal Connors d. Haarhauis 4-6, 7-6, 6-4, 6-2
  • Semifinal Courier d. Connors 6-3, 6-3, 6-2


  • First Round Krickstein d. Goellner 6-3, 6-1, 5-7, 6-1
  • Second Round Krickstein d. Ferriera 6-3, 6-7, 7-6, 6-3
  • Third Round Krickstein d. Korda 6-1, 6-4, 7-6
  • Fourth Round Krickstein d. Edberg 6-7, 5-7, 6-4, 7-6, 6-4
  • Quarterfinal Krickstein d. Eltingh 7-6, 6-4, 5-7, 6-4
  • Semifinal Agassi d. Krickstein 6-4, 6-4, 3-0 retired

It was hard to find clips of the 1995 Australian Open on youtube so I put his 1994 French Open second round upset of world then world #2 Michael Stich on instead.  Krickstein reached the round of 16 at the 1994 French Open.

9 Comments Add yours

  1. Marc says:

    Nicely done Dan…well-deserved for Aaron

    1. Dan Martin says:

      Thanks Marc! I will have some new content up tonight

  2. gary oxley says:

    Well Observed Dan . The 30/30 piece was interesting in that it allowed the viewer to reach the conclusion that it was Aarons loss to Jimmy in that 1991 Open and perhaps the manner in which he lost the match , that brought the curtain down on his career . Aaron himself abetted that by also lamenting the loss of Gullikson as his coach within a short time frame as well as mentioning his subsequent jobs once retired from the tour . That did Connors no favours at all in my opinion . The fact that Connors had seemingly shunned Krickstein in the aftermath of the match is also damning of Jimmy but not as revelatory as most would have us believe . One minute Connors is portrayed as a guy that no-one wanted to have as a friend and then ‘kricker’ seems to bemoan the lack of empathy from a good friend !!!!!! So I was confused at the end . I certainly gain the impression that Aaron Krickstein is an engaging and articulate guy and that Jimmy is just ,well ………Jimmy !! Cheers.

    1. Dan Martin says:

      I agree. I like Jimmy and always have. I think his steadfast nature to who he is does turn some people off, but he is who he is. Sampras likes Jimmy. Courier likes Jimmy. Some guys don’t like Agassi. Vitas liked him.

      1. Dr Box says:

        Is that “some guys don’t, like Agassi”?

      2. Dan Martin says:

        I meant some guys such as Agassi don’t like Connors.

  3. Dave Belloso says:

    Sorry to comment so late on this, but Aaron was my favorite player back in the day. The problem was that he had so much expectation heaped on him at such a young age, then took the brunt (along with Arias) of the criticism about the decline in American tennis immediately post-McEnroe and Connors. Injury after injury didn’t help his game or his ranking. He did eventually bounce back from all that negativity to have a great career and some significant wins. Our Davis Cup title in 1990 may well not have happened at all if he hadn’t gone to Prague (when no one else would) and won both his matches in terrific fashion. His late run in Australia in ’95 demonstrated what he could do. Unfortunately it may have also dealt him his most profound blow as he realized that his creaky body would never allow him to scale the heights that his fighting spirit was capable of. The ESPN documentary was about Connors’ memorable run at the Open, but for most people who saw it, it spoke volumes more about Krickstein’s character. The true epilogue to ESPN”s 30 for 30 was to read that Krickstein actually reached out to Connors less than a year later to invite him to an exhibition match (Connors’ last, if you believe him) that was played in great spirit and essentially capped this story with their friendship renewed. Nice guys may not always finish first, but as someone to emulate in terms of effort, perseverance, sportsmanship and character, it would be hard to top Aaron Krickstein. Thanks for reading.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s